Bible Study Notes - John 7:53 to
8:11
In
the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew chapters five, six and seven, the Lord Jesus
declares He did not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill it through His life,
preaching and teachings. He establishes
a “New Law of Love” which exceeds the requirements of the black letter
commandments of the Torah and Decalogue, The Ten Commandments. According to Jesus, simply adhering to the
Law’s stringent requirements does not equate with righteousness before the
Heavenly Father. Jesus condemns the
Pharisaical stratagem of building a hedge around the Law by staying within its
requirements to ensure a person does not break the Law. If the Law allows forty lashes, Pharisees
would stop at thirty-nine lashes seeking to guard against breaking the
Law. Rather, Jesus demands His disciples
consider the human element in observance of the Law. He harshly criticizes the Pharisees for
arguing against His performing miracles on the Sabbath though broken, lame,
blind, diseased, mute and otherwise unhealthy people would be left in their
pain and suffering due to technical adherence to the Law. The “New Law of Love” overrides this stench
of religiosity, piety and perhaps hypocrisy.
Rather, it prioritizes the needs and well-being of hurting people.
The
first chapter of the Gospel of Mark concludes with a story in which Jesus
demonstrates extraordinary love to a leper.
The evangelist says Jesus looks upon the man, probably being the first
person to show that man this kind of consideration and respect in quite a
while, and loves him. Remarkably, Jesus
touches the man thereby demonstrating His love for this leper. Jesus’ actions actually violate the Law by
having any contact with the leper. The
black letter Law prohibits Jesus from touching this leper lest He contaminate
other people with whom He would have contact afterwards. However, the “New Law of Love” mandates that
disciples look beyond technicalities and meet direct embodied needs of people
who linger in pain and suffering.
The
great apostle of love, John, vividly depicts the “New Law of Love” in this most
compelling scene in which Jesus extends love, grace and mercy to a woman caught
in the act of adultery. He looks beyond
the permissive punishment of the Law and offers her forgiveness, healing and
redemptive love. Chances are most people
recall this story because of the immortal and often quoted line, “Let the one
without sin cast the first stone.”
Recitation of that line focuses mostly on the sin and the questionable
right of the crowd to condemn the woman and justly punish her. More significantly, Jesus refuses to condemn
this woman. He even encourages her to
find a new life by ceasing her personally destructive behavior. Jesus’ graciousness and mercy are genuine
attributes of agape, the highest form of love which is selfless, sacrificial,
redemptive and transformative. Jesus
unfailingly loves this unnamed woman with His authentic concern for her
well-being as a child of Almighty God.
He desires that she accepts her inheritance as a daughter of God and
begin cultivating a character and lifestyle consistent with her true
identity.
In
this story which I peg as “The Beauty of Mercy,” Jesus demonstrates the true
essence of the entire teachings of the Law and the Prophets. Some biblical scholars suggest that Micah 6:8
summarizes the teachings of Jesus. “Do
justly, love mercy and walk humbly before God.”
This beautiful story of mercy illustrates this verse. It would be unjust, unreasonable and
unprincipled to condemn and stone this woman as the man with whom she is caught
goes free. She deserves mercy instead of
retribution as she is exploited by the religious leaders. Conceivably, she may have been a prostitute
and thus oppressed by certain economic and social conditions necessitating such
a demeaning and dehumanizing lifestyle.
As Jesus argues with Pharisees and other religious rulers, He reveals
their inability to walk humbly before God as the man who was with the woman may
have been one of them. In granting the
right to anyone in the crowd who had led a sinless to cast the first stone,
Jesus establishes mercy, grace and humility as cardinal principles in executing
and adjudicating matters under the “New Law of Love.”
This
story emphasizes the necessity of understanding and applying mercy when
relating with fellows disciples and even unbelievers according to the “New Law
of Love.” Mercy differs from grace as mercy
means sparing a potentially guilty person of a punishment he justly deserves. As it relates to American criminal law, an
act of mercy equals a pardon of a conviction whereby an incarcerated person is
freed and the State relinquishes its due right to demand that he serve the
remainder of his sentence. Grace, in
contrast, is God’s unmerited favor; practically speaking, grace is God’s
kindness toward a person which emerges from God’s generous character. In this story, Jesus exemplifies both of
these divine attributes.
Consider
the following questions and ideas as you study the passage.
·
This
story occurs in the temple courts. John
contrasts official and institutional religion with cultivating a relationship
with Almighty God through Jesus Christ. Religion
would execute the woman caught in adultery.
A relationship with a loving, gracious and merciful God yields a pardon.
·
As
you study the passage, compare the theological differences between Jesus and
the Pharisees.
·
Most
Bibles note the textual and manuscript problems of this story. The oldest and most reliable texts do not
have this story. Some scholars question
the reliability of this story. Do you
find their objections to be reasonable?
·
Nevertheless,
this story offers one of the most compelling instances of divine love and
grace. The power of its message
overshadows the textual and manuscript challenges.
·
Though
we have read it many times and possibly have hard numerous sermons on this
passage, it deserves our meticulous and careful reading and analysis.
·
After
teaching the crowd at the Feast of Tabernacles, Jesus retreats to the Mount of
Olives as they crowd disperses and returns to their homes. The Mount of Olives was one of Jesus’
favorite places to pray and communion with the Heavenly Father. There, Jesus ultimately prays the “High Priestly
Prayer” on the night Judas betrays Jesus and the other disciples desert Him. On this occasion, Jesus goes there for
spiritual rejuvenation. Jesus allows the
Father and Spirit to regenerate Him after teaching. His example is instructive for those persons
who serve in the household of faith.
Strength, power and wisdom come from God. We are vessels which require refueling like
automobiles.
·
Further,
this trip to the Mount of Olives prepares Jesus for His forthcoming encounter
with the Pharisees and this woman who is caught in the very act of
adultery. He gleans the divine wisdom
and insight to teach this smaller crowd about God’s attributes of love, grace,
mercy and compassion.
·
Just
after sunrise, at dawn, Jesus appears in the temple courts where the people had
gathered. He sits down in order to teach
them about the character of Almighty God.
·
Note
the evangelist’s use of the themes of light and darkness with his mention of
the dawn. As the fourth watch of the
night yields to the burst of dawn, John recites an incredible story of grace
and mercy versus legalism and religious tradition. This literary technique entices the reader to
determine who stands in the darkness and who lives in the light. The evangelist posits Jesus is the “Light of the
World.” Persons who refuse to believe in
Him stumble forever in darkness. Adherence
to religious traditions and self-righteous personal piety which the Pharisees
and teachers of the Law personify equates with walking in darkness. Instead, disciples have an opportunity to
leave the darkness of self-reliance and ritualism and walk into the dawn of new
life in a relationship with Jesus Christ.
·
Providing
an ideal opportunity but with the ulterior motive of entrapment, the teachers
of the Law and Pharisees bring a woman caught in the act of adultery to
ascertain what Jesus recommends as to her punishment given the clear and explicit
commandments of the Law.
·
It
does not appear these religious rulers and teachers have any concern for this
woman. She is a pawn in theological chess
game. They relegate her to collateral
and expendable human waste as they seek to discredit Jesus and His teachings. The evangelist cautions disciples against
this rabid and irrational indifference to humankind’s dilemmas. The Gospel of our Lord and Savior challenges
disciples to grapple with people’s incapacities and daily messiness of their
lives. Ironically, these learned, religious
people are indifferent to this hurting woman.
·
It
stands to reason that if the woman was caught in an act of adultery she was
with a man. Where is the man? Who was the man? Why do the Pharisees and teachers of the Law
fail to insist that the man be punished?
·
Admittedly,
during those biblical times in the Ancient Near East, woman did not possess
equality with men. However, the Law
stipulates that both persons caught in adultery be stoned to death.
·
At
the Weekly Bible Study and Prayer Meeting, participants reasoned that the man
was a member of the Sanhedrin, the ruling religious council of the Jews comprising
an equality of Pharisee and Sadducees.
The leaders were protecting one of their own. They allow him to hide within the crowd and
escape scrutiny and judgment.
·
The
religious leaders ask Jesus for a decision regarding this woman’s fate as a
means of entrapping Him. They hope He
will proactively violate the Law. They
would like justification for their desire to assassinate Jesus. If they can deceptively gain His
acquiescence, then they will garner the support of the crowd in their dastardly
deed of committing a “righteous murder.”
·
This
scene teaches us to be discerning about the motives of people’s questions. What is the “real” question? When people ask us a question, what do they
really want to know? Have you ever had
the experience of someone calling to ask for your counsel and advice only to discover
that the person called merely to gain your approval of an idea they previously
determined was correct? The person
really was not interested in your thoughts and suggestions. He only wanted your uncritical cooperation.
·
In
response, the text says Jesus bent down and wrote in the sand with a His finger. What a bizarre reaction to such a pivotal
question proffered by the religious leaders of the nation! What leads the evangelist to include this
detail without telling us exactly what Jesus writes in the sand? After all, John witnesses this event firsthand. He read what Jesus wrote.
·
What
do you think Jesus writes in the sand? I
suspect it was something merciful and gracious perhaps the word, “Forgiven.”
·
It
is generous of John to leave this detail open as he allows us to fill in the
blanks of what the Lord would write were we to exchange places with this
woman. Really, all disciples have been
in her place at some point along their spiritual journey. In omitting this detail, John invites us to
personalize this passage just as he encourages us to develop a very personal relationship
with the Lord Jesus Christ. Doubtless,
until the day of her death, this woman vividly remembers what Jesus writes in
the sand. For anyone who genuinely encounters
Him, the day and time of the beginning of a relationship with Jesus remains indelibly
within a person’s mind and heart.
·
The
teachers of the Law and Pharisees persist in questioning as to His
interpretation and application of the Law in this instance. They greatly desire success of their
entrapment scheme.
·
Jesus
straightens up and says these immortal words, “Let anyone of you who is without
sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”
This spiritual maxim teaches us to reflect with levity and grace before
quickly passing judgment upon someone.
Have we done what they have been accused of doing? Have been recipients of God’s grace when we
rightly deserved punishment and condemnation?
Can we identify with the accused persons pain, fear, ignorance,
incapacities and other defects of character that may have contributed to the commission
of sin? Were we ever given a second
chance? Can we determine a resolution that
is restorative rather than retributive?
Do we have any legitimate right to stand in judgment of anyone? The list of questions we ask in response to
Jesus standard of justice is inexhaustible.
·
The
verse, John 8:7, establishes the “New Law of Love.” As the crowd reflects upon their past
mistakes, sin and patterns of behavior that undermine their inheritance as children
of Almighty God, they extend mercy to this woman as they realize they previously
had committed offenses punishable by death but had also been recipients of the
grace of God. As receivers of
forgiveness and grace, they become givers of mercy.
·
Jesus’
words offer an entire new beginning to the woman and the crowd as they receive a
new insight for adjudicating sin. They
now have a new spiritual guide with which to handle people’s errors. The “New Law of Love” mandates the importance
of human pain and suffering as well as building better relationships will
enable the creation of a more just and equitable society as disciples strive to
adjudicate disputes with a transformative purpose for the individual and
reconciliation within relationships.
·
Then,
Jesus stoops down and begins to write in the sand again. True to His method of teaching, Jesus announces
a profound spiritual principle and then allows it to explode in the mind,
consciousness and heart of the hearers.
·
Usually,
Jesus embeds divine wisdom within a story as the parables in the Gospel
demonstrate. We are not privy to how the
rich young ruler, Simon the Pharisee or the nine lepers ultimately processed and
applied Jesus’ teachings. We simply know
that the rich young ruler went away sad.
In time, he may have joined the Jesus movement. Simon the Pharisee castigates Jesus for allowing
a prostitute to touch Him yet alone wash His feet with her hair and
perfume. Did this upright and stalwart
religious man ever understand divine compassion and forgiveness as Jesus instructed
him that afternoon in Simon’s dining room?
As it relates to the nine lepers who did not turn around to express
thanks for their healing and new lease on life, perhaps, they “paid it forward”
in subsequent years as they graciously and bountifully help other suffering people. Simply put, it may have taken time for these
lepers to realize fully the incalculable and miraculous blessing they
received. In that time, gratitude grew
within their minds and hearts. When the epiphany
occurred, they practiced their thanksgiving by helping other people. Decades after graduating from high school and
college, students finally appreciate the sacrifices of their teachers. Lessons that they did not grasp while
enrolled in courses burst with clarity on the horizon of their minds and
consciousness like a new dawn. Then,
these students may write their teachers and genuinely express gratitude for their
commitment and dedication to education and learning.
·
When
the truth erupts between their ears like the burning, fierce lava of an active
volcano, the crowd drops their stones and disperses acknowledging their inability
to judge this woman. They leave her
standing alone in the presence of Jesus who is the only Person in the crowd
qualified to pass judgment on this woman.
Consistent with the teaching of the fifty-first psalm, disciplines sin
against God and God alone. Eventually,
sinners stand before the presence of God to receive His decision relating to their
choices and consequences. Only a perfect
and loving God can perfectly adjudicate sin.
Disciples like this woman stand alone in the presence of Almighty God.
·
It
is particularly significant that John explicitly states that the older persons
in the crowd leave first! A walk down
memory lane usually yields compassion and forgiveness. However, periodically “senior and seasoned
saints” forget the days of youth, temptation, ignorance, impulse, and
immaturity. Their mental lapses
inadvertently lead them to employ an unjust standard when evaluating the behavior
of seekers, sinners and other people who come to church. They expect people to arrive without
challenges and character defects. They
forget the long and painstaking process of spiritual growth they experienced
enroute to becoming a person of honesty, integrity and truth.
·
A
critical conversation ensues between Jesus and this woman. After the crowd leaves them alone, Jesus
straightens up again and directly addresses the woman. He asks about the whereabouts of the people
who sought to stone her. “Has no
remained to condemn you?” She says, “No
one sir.”
·
With
the elegance of mercy, Jesus tells her that neither does he condemn her. He spares her death sentence which would have
been executed had He not intervene. Moreover,
Jesus gives her new life.
·
He
concludes their conversation with an encouraging and empowering word, “Go now
and leave your life of sin.” In order to
receive her new life, this woman must make fundamental changes in her choices and
lifestyle. She cannot continue a life of
prostitution and adultery. Otherwise,
she would trample upon the grace of God.
·
Contemporary
disciples have a similar obligation to appreciate God’s gifts of grace and
mercy by daily practicing spiritual disciplines which enable their spiritual maturity
and personal growth.
·
Notwithstanding
the enduring and valid textual criticisms which biblical scholars and other serious
students of the Bible offer relating to this passage, it is a priceless
portrait of “The Beauty of Mercy.”
Utilizing the grand literary techniques of duality (light and darkness,
religion versus a relationship with God, legalism and liberty, punishment
versus pardon and judgment and mercy), the great evangelist of love brilliantly
and succinctly paints with meticulous detail a divine example of unfailing love,
compassion, forgiveness and mercy.
CAN I UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE?
ReplyDeleteIs it possible for Christians to read the Bible and comprehend it without church leaders interpreting it for them? Did God intend for the clergy to search the Scriptures; then write their private interpretation in a creed book so the laity could understand His doctrines?
Colossians 4:16 When this letter is read among you, have it also read in the church of the Laodiceans; and you, for your part read my letter that is coming from Laodicea.
The apostle Paul instructed that his letters be read to the churches. Paul did not tell the church leaders to interpret his letters and write them in a creed book so the common church member could understand them. NOTE: PAUL'S LETTERS WERE SCRIPTURES.
Revelation 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hears the words of the prophecy, and heeds the things which are written in it; for the time is near.
The apostle John said blessed is he who reads the things written, he did not say interpret my letters, then write them in a catechism so the laity can understand them.
2 Timothy 3:15 and that from childhood you have know the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
The apostle Paul told Timothy that the Holy Scriptures were able to give him wisdom that leads to salvation. Paul did not mention anything about the church hierarchy writing their opinions of Scripture in a creed book, catechism, or statement of faith, so he could understand the Scriptures.
God wrote the Bible so all men might know and understand His doctrines.
GOD DID NOT AUTHORIZE CHURCH LEADERS TO WRITE PRIVATE INTERPRETATIONS OF THE BIBLE IN THE FORM OF CREED BOOKS, CATECHISMS, STATEMENTS OF FAITH, ETC.
YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY CHRISTIAN BLOG. Bing search>>> steve finnell a christian view