“As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.” (Proverbs 27:17 – NIV) Today, I launch a new clergy collegial blog. I hope we will encourage and empower each other toward success and excellence in pastoral ministry. As I sit in the Pastor’s Study at Cambria Heights Community Church, I often ponder the possible feedback of clergy colleagues as it relates to preparing sermons, counseling in particularly difficult situation, designing fresh worship, balancing competing priorities of ministry, marriage and family, maintaining self-care, pursuing personal dreams and private interests outside of ministry and family, and finding resources to meet the ever evolving and changing needs of the people whom I serve. After a sustained period of prayer, reflection and meditation, I realize I can invite you to come “In The Pastor’s Study” for an exchange of ideas.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Bible Study Notes - Gospel of John 4:1-26 Part II


Bible Study Notes – Gospel of John 4:1-26 
Part II

  • Her entrenched beliefs will be the basis of her defensiveness later in the conversation.  Like many contemporary Christians, this woman struggles to align her beliefs with her lifestyle.  When questioned about nay inconsistencies, she appeals to the correctness of her theoretical beliefs as justification.
  • In an act of pure empathy, Jesus foregoes furthering any controversy about religion. He shifts the conversation to a discussion of genuine spirituality as it develops as a natural outgrowth of a vibrant relationship with Almighty God.
  • In employing the symbolism of living water, Jesus demonstrates the limited ability of staid religious beliefs to affect positively someone’s life.  Just as anyone drinking from Jacob’s well at noon on a sunny day in this Middle Eastern town will thirst again, anyone relying upon theoretical religious concepts will still thirst for love, peace, joy and wholeness.
  • In contrast, Jesus offers living water which is the Holy Spirit and His fruit which become an everlasting spring of abundant and eternal life within anyone who receives Christ.  The fruit of the Holy Spirit is faithfulness, gentleness, goodness, joy, kindness, love, peace, patience and self-control.  These attributes yield an unimaginable life!  Moreover, they naturally further a growing relationship with Almighty God.  Whether you adhere to orthodox doctrine or not, if you progress in a relationship with God, He will satisfy any existential thirst you have.
  • The Samaritan woman immediately asks for living water.  Although, she still relegates her thirst to a physical need instead of spiritual or emotional ones.  Yet, her question ends with a desire to remove the need of returning to the well each day.  Perhaps, her statement signifies the limitations she sees in her religion.
  • With loving empathy, Jesus incredulously responds by asking her to call her husband.  This conversation must have been one of the strangest ones the Samaritan woman ever had.  In reply to her request for living water, Jesus instructs this woman to retrieve her husband.  What does her marital status have to do with her desire for living water?  Actually, it is central to her ability to receive it.  Prophetically, Jesus knows she possesses a very deep thirst for genuine, unconditional love.  He senses her tremendous need which ritualistic religion cannot satisfy.  Significantly, Jesus does not raise the issue to condemn or demean her.  He addresses her deepest need and pain.  Practically speaking, he feels her need thereby showing her considerable and incredible empathy.  He switches places with this woman because His heart feels her pain.
  • The Samaritan woman answers factually.  She says “I have no husband.”  This fact, however, cloaks her deep emotional, spiritual and psychological need.  Her limited truthfulness demonstrates the inadequacies of her religious commitment.
  • Jesus acknowledges the truth of her statement.  Yet, he challenges her to examine the underlying and more significant truth which belies the factual correctness of her answer.  Having been married five times previously and currently living with a man, this Samaritan woman greatly desires love.  I imagine she probably is not older than forty if she has reached that age.  Consider her internal thirst for relational and financial security which she expects to find in marriage.  Imagine the cumulative emotional pain she suffers as she risks again and again to find genuine love.  Ponder the self-condemnation she imparts upon herself as a “serial monogamist.”  Think of the things her mother, siblings, childhood friends and neighbors have said to her over the years.  Then as well as now, society assuredly judges and dismisses someone who experiences this number of marriages.  In stark contrast, Jesus departs from this conventional practice.  He refuses to condemn this woman.  He loves here and desires inner healing and wholeness for her.  Jesus does not humiliate this woman; instead he genuinely empathizes with her hurt and seeks her restoration.
  • Regrettably, she reignites the religious and ethnic argument.  She appeals to the mountain on which they are standing as her religious and personal justification.  Whereas she respects Jesus as a prophet, she believes his words emerge from his Jewish beliefs. 
  • On the contrary, Jesus redirects the conversation toward genuine spirituality.  In the twenty-first verse, he dismisses her emphasis upon geography whether on Jacob’s mountain or in Jerusalem.  Without any definitive commitment to God with a heartfelt intention to strive for integrity, does it matter where you worship?
  • In the next verse, Jesus declares salvation originates with the Jews.  After all, Yahweh makes His initial covenant with the Israelites who are to be a light unto every other nation.  Then, Jesus who is the Lord and Savior of the world is a Jew.  Accordingly, anti-Semitism is antithetical to Christianity.  I refer you to Romans 9 to 11 where Paul details God’s covenantal commitment to Israel even in the new covenant with Jesus Christ.
  • The twenty-third and twenty-fourth verses arguably comprise the heart of this passage.  Jesus defines true worshipers as those people who glorify and honor the Father in Spirit and in truth.  Disciples develop a vibrant relationship with the Holy Spirit, the third Person of the Trinity, the Triune God.  The Holy Spirit is not a religious concept.  He is a Person with whom believers relate in order to know His voice and receive His wisdom.  The Scriptures contain Christ’s truth.  Disciples adhere to the Bible in their lifestyles.  James exhorts us to be “doers of the Word” more so than mere “hearers of the Word.”  Our Heavenly Father seeks worshipers whose lifestyle accords with Christ’s commands. 
  • Jesus says God is spirit.  This teaching relegates the enduring controversies about Christ’s physical appearance to meaninglessness.  Ultimately, we are eternal spirits who are born of the Great Eternal Spirit, Almighty God Himself.  To honor and glorify Him, we do so with love, truth, justice, joy and integrity.
  • Still, the Samarian woman returns to her religious argument.  She dismisses Jesus’ teachings with a reference to the coming Messiah who will explain divine truth.
  • Jesus concludes their conversation with a self-declaration as the Messiah.
  • The Samaritan woman discovers genuine faith in Almighty God as she encounters Jesus.  God offers the same privilege to anyone who humbly and authentically receives Jesus into his or her heart.



Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Bible Study Notes - Gospel of John 4:1-26 - Part I


Bible Study Notes – Gospel of John 4:1-26 – Part I

We continue our study of the Gospel of John, “Encountering Jesus.”  The great apostle of love writes this gospel to share the human side of Almighty God whom Jesus personifies during His earthly journey.  In Jesus, we glimpse the essence of God’s unconditional love.  Jesus declares the “Word became flesh and dwelt amongst us.”  In Jesus, God identifies directly with our daily challenges.  As we study John, we will focus upon Jesus’ teachings and the life changing encounters of the people who meet him.

This week’s passage is a very familiar text which records the encounter of Jesus and the Samaritan woman at the well.  When we study a passage about which we have heard many sermons and studied often in Sunday School or Weekly Bible Study and Prayer Meeting, we fall prey to the tendency and temptation of concluding there is no greater or further revelation on this text.  Consequently, I ask you to pray immediately and ask the Holy Spirit to share a fresh revelation of the Word of God with you as you open your mind and heart to Him.  Pray and ask the Holy Spirit to reveal new, fresh and penetrating insights which you can apply to our own life as you strive for greater maturity as a disciple.

Usually, people approach this text by emphasizing the acuteness with which Jesus identifies the hidden sin of the Samaritan woman.  She conveniently withholds her five past marriages and current arrangement of living together with a man to whom she is not married.  Notwithstanding these very personal moral and ethical challenges she has, she steadfastly defends her religious convictions.  She straightforwardly rebuffs Jesus’ approach and teaching about Almighty God.  This woman perseveres in an emerging debate about the nature, promises and character of God. 

Parenthetically, the Samaritan woman is more than chagrined at Jesus’ request for a drink of water from her.  The Samaritans and Jews intensely despised each other because of centuries of petrified hatred.  In 722 BCE, the Assyrians sacked the Jewish people and nearly destroyed their culture, language, literature and religion.  Afterwards, some Jews taken in captivity intermarried with the Assyrians; their offspring became the Samaritans.  The Jews who forcefully resisted this assimilation and acculturation disdained their relatives who acquiesced out of fear, convenience and hopelessness.  Pejoratively, the “pure” Jews characterized the Samaritans as “half breeds” who abandoned their heritage, culture, legacy and inheritance as detailed by the covenantal promises of Almighty God.  On the contrary, the Samaritans as partial descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob straightforwardly demanded the promises of these covenants as they exist for any of the patriarchs’ posterity.  In time, these racial, ethnic and cultural differences morph into major theological, political and social controversies.  The enduring hatred between the Samaritans and Jews provide the context of this encounter at well. 

I suggest this encounter centers more upon authentic worship of God than anything else.  The Samaritan woman’s character deficiencies are significant yet secondary.  As the Johannine evangelist stipulates later in the Gospel, moral and ethical obedience are natural outgrowths of a genuine relationship with God.  John’s perspective further recommends religion as a means of a right relationship with God but not a viable or worthy substitute.  This woman fails to see any contradiction between her lifestyle and her beliefs.  She seemingly assumes her “reasonable” religious beliefs surmount her lack of integrity.  Jesus does not condemn her.  Rather, He challenges her concepts about genuine worship of God.  In this exchange, John records the Lord’s pivotal teaching about “true worship of God” which combines Spirit and truth.  I bemoan the prevalent declaration of many celebrities, “I am spiritual and not religious.”  Whereas I am yet to hear a clear discourse detailing the finer points of distinction between these two adjectives, I find it interesting that most people who utilize this phrase have lifestyles reminiscent of the Samaritan woman.  One actress who recently uttered this phrase has been married five times before reaching forty-five years of age.  Does being spiritual rather than religious exempt a person from moral obligations?  Nevertheless, Jesus’ inquiry to the Samaritan woman posits the necessity of lifestyle integrity and doctrinal correctness.  Essentially, He declares God wants people to follow and worship Him who do so with their heart, mind, soul and strength.  In adhering to this “Great Commandment,” we demonstrate our love for Almighty God with a lifestyle of integrity of word and deed.

Consider the following ideas and questions as you study this passage.

  • The first verse of this text notes the Pharisee’s concern about Jesus’ rising popularity.  The evangelist notes Jesus’ disciples were gaining more adherents and conducting more baptisms than John the Baptizer.  Earlier in the gospel, John forcefully stated “I must decrease so He can increase.”  Although John is Jesus’ elder cousin, he subordinates his ministry to Jesus in obedience to divine revelation and fulfillment of prophecy.
  • Sensing the growing opposition and hatred of the religious rulers, Jesus leaves Judea and retreats to his home turf of Galilee.    As he travels, Jesus goes through Samaria, a place where he would not ordinarily receive hospitable greetings as one hundred percent full-bloodied Jew. 
  • In the town of Sychar, Samaria, near a plot of ground Jacob, the father of the twelve Israelite patriarchs, had given to Joseph, Jesus stops for water, rest and refreshment.  Adjacent to Jacob’s well, held as a sacred religious place for the Samaritan people, at approximately noon time, Jesus encounters a Samaritan woman.
  • Her presence is very odd at this time of day.  Normally, the women of surrounding communities went to this well just after sunrise to catch water for cooking and other daily uses.  This woman’s isolation coerces us to question her motives for being present at a public well in the middle of that day knowing she would encounter multiple men.  What are her motives?
  • Interestingly, her paths cross with our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.  Left alone by His disciples who travel to a neighboring town to buy food, Jesus is the man this woman encounters notwithstanding her motives.  He asks her for a drink as she approaches the well to draw water.  Perhaps, she considers this question to be a “pick up line.” 
  • Nevertheless, this woman rebuffs Jesus’ question with an inquiry her own.  Knowing the disdain with which Jews held Samaritans, she asks Jesus what leads him to ask her for a drink.  The prejudice against Samaritans by Jews was so great that the latter group would not even use dishes which the former group had utilized.  This practice is reminiscent of the intractable racial prejudice of the American South during the century of segregation following the Civil War.
  • In the commanding tenth verse, Jesus answers her with a peculiar reply.  If she knew the gift of God and who really asked for the water, she would quickly reverse roles and ask Him for a drink and in turn receive living water.  Let’s assume the place of the Samaritan woman.  Imagine her reaction to such an odd statement.  Initially, she hesitates because of the longstanding, historical ethnic strife between their respective people.  Allowing her possible ulterior motives given the inconsistency of her timing and loneliness, she finds Jesus’ request for water most interesting as he forthrightly asks although his appearance reveals He is a Jew.  Beyond her amazement about his straightforward and immediate request, she now receives a very perturbing reply which actually questions her understanding of her religion.
  • The apostle John, author of the gospel, uses the words of Jesus’ reply in the tenth verse to remind the reader of His divinity.  Further, Jesus is the Messiah for whom both Samaritans and Jews had been waiting for centuries.  The evangelist challenges us to consider how we view Jesus.  How do we define Him? 
  • In the eleventh verse, the Samaritan woman inquires practically about Jesus’ lack of a dipper, ladle or bucket with which to draw living water.  Conceivably, many persons upon encountering Jesus ask about the incongruence between His teaching, preaching and healing with modern science and technology.  They would like to exercise faith but they experience difficulty in reconciling the gospel with the scientific method, psychology and other branches of the social and behavioral sciences.  Can the gospel of Jesus Christ continually perform the personal miracle of transformation and renewal when we are able to attempt self-actualization?  Where is this miracle potion and how do we get it?  The woman asks where she can obtain living water. 
  • She then asks Jesus if he is greater than Jacob who imparted the Law to his sons.  This question reveals the Samaritan woman’s religious beliefs.  As someone of partial Israelite heritage, she claims Jacob and his forebears as her spiritual ancestors. 


Monday, January 9, 2012

Sermon - Have You Got Good Religion? Luke 10:25-37


Have You Got Good Religion? - Luke 10:25-37
A sermon on social justice ministry

The following column is a revised manuscript of a keynote address and sermon by the same title I delivered on the occasion of The Fourteenth Annual African-American Church Day on the Hill, 7 March 2006, at Legislative Plaza in Nashville TN.

The story is told of a king who lives in a magnificent castle in one of the most picturesque areas of Scotland.  He takes great pride in the beauty and breathtaking aesthetic of his home.  However, he laments his lack of a wall to surround the castle and blend with the marvelous landscape.  The king summons his chief steward and instructs him to search through all the land and locate the best stone possible to construct a wall that will adorn appropriately the castle and the landscape.  The king departs for a long and lengthy journey.  Upon his return, he finds a glorious wall near the place where the castle once stood.  Immediately, the king calls for the chief steward so that he may inquire about what happened to the castle.  The steward, in response to the king’s inquiries, answers, “My Lord, did you not direct me to find the best stone in all the land and build a wall?  Well, the best stone was already in the castle.  So, I tore down the castle and built the wall according to your directions.”  In utter sorrow, the king says, “We have built a wall and lost the castle.”

That story challenges us to evaluate what we are building in the Church.  I fear that we are building walls of human monuments while losing the castle, which is the Church, which is the people.  The Church is the people!  It is not bricks and mortar.  The recent church building projects in our State probably equals billions of dollars.  I wonder whether we would raise comparable amounts of money for direct service and social advocacy ministries.  Whereas we are willing to put extraordinary amounts of money into buildings with lots of high tech equipment, are we equally willing and committed to putting comparable amounts of money into people, seeking to resolve many of the social dilemmas that plaque us?  Will we maintain the castle, the people of God instead of building walls of human glory?

My primary question remains, “Have You Got Good Religion?”  Many of us fondly remember that old Negro spiritual in which the song leader raises this pivotal question.  Then, the congregation replies with the phrase, “Certainly Lord!  Certainly Certainly Lord!”  The leader goes on to ask other questions, “Have you been baptized,”  “Do you know Jesus,” and “Do want to go to heaven?”  The audience responds the same to each question as an affirmation of their confidence in the substance of their religion.  Yet, the main question of this enduring spiritual leads to another significant question.  What is good religion? 

I posit that good religion includes more than ritual, rites, rules and a fallacious question for self-righteousness and personal piety.  Instead, good religion necessitates a vibrant and genuine relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ.  That relationship requires us to mature into His disciples by unconditionally submitting our wills and lives to His Lordship and care.  Practically speaking, we abandon our lives to His purposes.  The gospel of Luke speaks of our daily crucifixion.  Thereby, God in Christ resurrects us to new life so that we may live to His honor and glory.

Again, the question remains, “What is good religion?”  The contemporary American Church seems to value greatly worship.  Hundreds of millions perhaps even billions of dollars are spent each week to produce high tech and magnanimous worship services.  Some churches rival Hollywood, Broadway, the major television networks and production companies as it relates to the quality of their worship performances.  Second, we generally characterize churches with seven-figure operating budgets as successes.  Third, if a church completes a multi-million dollar renovation, many people assume that that is evidence of good religion.  Again, the emphasis falls upon the building rather than the people.  Fourth, should large numbers of people attend worship at any church, then most believers attribute those numbers to the presence of the Holy Spirit.  Fifth, a minister’s or a church’s presence on television, radio, the world wide web or some other form of media automatically means that God is blessing that person or church in the opinions of many folks.  Yet, the sum of the foregoing points do not necessarily equate with the Bible’s definition of good religion.

Good religion includes the spiritual characteristics of love, truth, justice, mercy and grace, which are the eternal and enduring values of life.  The Parable of the Good Samaritan teaches us that good religion requires us to care for our neighbors wherever we find them.  Good religion equals an endeavor to rightly relate to Almighty God and treat all of His children with His love and justice because of one’s relationship with Him.  In contemporary America, this parable challenges the Church to find the compassion and commitment to stop for those brothers and sisters who are in need.  More specifically, the American Church faces the crucial test of transforming its resources into bandages, oil and healing instruments so that those who are broken may be made whole.

Lest we build walls of human monuments to the glory and achievement of ourselves and not the genuine castle of the Church, which is the family of God, we must focus specifically upon the victim in the parable of “The Good Samaritan.”  You recall that a man travels from Jericho to Jerusalem.  Along that road, he falls into the hands of robbers who steal his money and property and leave him to die.  Interestingly, the victim is traveling from a Gentile city to the city of God where the Temple is.  Perhaps, he is on the annual pilgrimage to observe the Passover in Jerusalem; maybe the architectural lure of the great and glorious Temple captures his imagination.  Regardless of his reason for the trip, he appears headed toward a possible life-changing experience with Almighty God.  But, he falls into the clutches of thieves and violent criminals.

As he lies on the Jericho road and life ebbs out of him, he sees a priest.  One imagines that this victim breathes a sigh of relief.  Quite possibly, he says to himself, “My prayers have been answered royally.  God has sent a caring and affectionate priest to attend to my needs.  He could have simply sent anyone considering my dire circumstances.”  The victim’s prayer may have been one of those bargains with God, “If you get me out of this fix, I’ll serve You forever.”  Imagine the horror that came over him when the priest looks upon his wretched condition, which shows the victim’s obvious need of medical attention and help; crosses over to the other side; and proceeds along his way. 

Least you believe that my presentation centers upon the melodramatic, please consider the countless and daily ways in which we cross over the beaten victims in our lives.  Locally, in Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County, we have yet to commit fundamentally to funding the public school system, which heals the wounds of the 70,000 children who attend.  Another local issue is the potential closing of Meharry General Hospital which serves the most vulnerable citizens, many of whom are indigent, economically disadvantaged and very ill.  To accomplish his TennCare reforms, Governor Philip N. Bredesen expended $8.5 million in attorneys’ fees.  Meanwhile, he reneged on a deal to appropriate the necessary funds to prevent this critical hospital from closing. 

On the State level, we still have heard the cries of the 719,000 persons whose lives have been adversely affected by Governor Philip N. Breseden’s “reforms” in TennCare.  Included in that number are 191,000 persons who have been dropped from healthcare altogether.  Many others have had their prescription benefits severely reduced notwithstanding their significant need for medications because of transplant surgeries, cardio bypasses and invasive procedures.  These brothers and sisters have been left on the Jericho road to die.  Actually, some of them have died due to these draconian cuts. 

The conflict in Iraq has resulted in the deaths of nearly 2300 American military casualties.  In the three years of this debacle, we still await a reasonable explanation for this military engagement.  No weapons of mass destruction have been found!  The country has already spent $331 billion.  Next year this time, we would have expended $450 billion, nearly a half a trillion dollars.  There is no social program in the history of this country that we have ever committed that amount of money to.  Those figures equal approximately $330 million a day!  Imagine what we could do with public education in the United States if we ever appropriated comparable amounts of funds to it. 

Then, Levite comes along after the priest.  Perhaps, he was wearing some robes or identifiable clothing.  At that point, I suppose that the victim began to feel that God had immediately answered his prayer again.  Again, imagine how flabbergasted that this man must have been when this second clergyman passed him over also.  Rather surprisingly, a Samaritan comes upon this man.  The victim might have thought that this Gentile will probably finish me off.  But, contrary to his deepest suspicions and prejudices, the victims finds that God answers his prayers through the presence and compassionate gifts of this Samaritan.  Contemporarily, we describe this Samaritan as an “unchurched” person who may or may not believe in the Lord.  Perhaps, he is a secular humanist who doubts the Lord because of the consistent and persistent failures of the Church to live the gospel instead of merely preaching it.

Essentially the Church has abdicated its responsibility to care for the least in society.  Admittedly, we pay taxes and our government on all three levels should use those resources wisely.  Notwithstanding the fact that Americans are the most prosperous people who have ever lived in the history of humankind, we have not resolved one major social, economic or political dilemma that plagues our society.  We have not irreversibly cured any diseases like breast cancer.  Poverty and homelessness greatly victimizes countless persons each day.  What a waste of the gifts, abilities and talents that Almighty God has deposited within each of those persons!  Nevertheless, the Lord directs the Church to care for the most vulnerable persons in society.  It is our prerogative and responsibility to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves.  Moreover, the Church must advocate for these persons, endeavoring to eliminate the systemic causes and barriers that oppress our brothers and sisters who resemble the victim on the Jericho road.  Like him, they cannot get to Jerusalem to experience the fullness of knowing God because of the wholesale socio-economic and socio-political impediments that deprive them of inner healing and wholeness.

Again, it appears that an “unchurched” person, the Good Samaritan, fulfills the duty of the priests.  Likewise, contemporarily, many people of good will with requisite morals and ethics step into the gap that the Church leaves when we preoccupy ourselves with worship, conferences, building funds, and multimedia ministries.  The Church appears to lack bandages, oil and wine with which to heal those who are wounded by the trials and challenges of life. 

The destruction of Hurricane Katrina poignantly depicts the impotence and indifference of the Church.  Of the fifteen thousand persons who once resided on New Orleans and came to the Nashville area, not one of them has said that the Church evacuated him or her.  More significantly, I personally detested the response of the African-American Church on a denominational level.  Whereas many individual churches responded with immediate compassion and direct assistance, our denominations merely criticized President Bush and FEMA.  One of the largest Black Churches in New Orleans, “One Church in Three Locations,” did not evacuate anyone.  I stand to be corrected.  Actually, I understand that the Pastor of that Church flew out of town on a private plane on the day before the storm.  Interestingly, he surfaced on national television later that week; joining the foray of criticism of the Bush Administration, FEMA and the U. S. Department of Homeland Security.  More unfortunately, that Pastor stood in a pulpit in Nashville, two months to the day after Hurricane Katrina, and gave a check in the amount of $187,000 to a local Pastor and instructed him to buy a Bentley with the money.  Imagine how that money could have been used to help survivors of the storm!  Nevertheless, these dismal failures demonstrate the colossal waste of the Church’s resources in the face of such drastic human pain and suffering.

I would like to offer a few suggestions for possible bandages, oil, wine that we, the Church, can begin to use to heal others.  First, we should go to Capitol Hill and fight for Meharry General Hospital.  Should that facility close, thousands of people, including many indigent babies and children, will be left on the Jericho road.  Second, we must advocate on behalf of the 719,000 citizens whose lives have been adversely affected by Governor Bredesen’s draconian TennCare cuts.  We must reverse these cuts!  We must lobby the members of the Tennessee State Legislature and ask them not to pass a state budget that continues these cuts.  Third, we must prioritize the funding of public education in Tennessee.  Grades pre-K to four must be a central priority.  It is hard to accept that many church-attending and God-fearing citizens voted for and play the Tennessee State Lottery.  We have the distinction in this State of having the highest paid, legal numbers runner in the country.  What is more, working class and poor residents of Shelby County are actually assisting middle-class and affluent people in Knox County to attend college at a great discount.  I favor eliminating the lottery and reallocating state funds to expand the quality of public education in Tennessee.  The fourth bandage that I suggest that we find is a period of personal meditation in which we ask God about running for public office and against one of the incumbents in the Tennessee General Assembly.  Members of the legislature have become very comfortable.  Some of them need to be removed from office.  Accordingly,  I ask you to go home and pray about this possibility.

I end as I began.  I ask you, “Have You Got Good Religion?”


Friday, January 6, 2012

Christian Practices


Christian Practices

1.  Prayer                       talk to God

2.  Meditation                listen to God

3.  Worship                    faithful attendance

4.  Daily Quiet Time     personal worship

5.  Bible Study               personal and collective

6.  Stewardship                    good use of resources

7.  Evangelizing             sharing the faith
(Philemon 5)
Matthew 28:16-20

8.  Social Justice            loving people
Isaiah 61:1-3
Luke 4:18

9.  Ecology                     caring for the Earth

10.                   Fellowship         loving the church family
Micah 6:8
Matthew 18:15-20

11.                   Giving                financial sacrifices

12.                   Ministry             use of time and talents
in building the kingdom
Matthew 25


·      These practices comprise the foundation of “disciplined piety.”
·      Daily and consistent observance of them will further the personal development and spiritual growth of the membership.
·      Moreover, these practices are viable solutions to the personal challenges and problems of the congregation.

The Art of a Pastoral Conversation


The Art of a Pastoral Conversation


¨      A pastoral conversation is not a science.  It is a ministerial art form acquired through the experience of trial and error.


¨      In order to grow at it, one must truly care for the persons whom one seeks to serve.  You can be taught how to communicate effectively in order to serve.  However, you cannot be taught how to care.  Caring is intrinsic.


¨      Consider a pastoral conversation as a theological event.


¨      The counselee is struggling with his perception of God in the midst of his situation.


¨      The counselor is seeking to elucidate the presence of God.


¨      Listening is vitally important.  Moreover, listening with the eyes surpasses the ears in a lot of instances.  Eighty-five percent (85%) of communication is non-verbal.


¨      Find ways to assure the counselee that you are listening to him.


¨      Repeat or paraphrase key statements, i.e., “If I am hearing you correctly, then you would like x.”


¨      Reassure the counselee that the conversation will be kept confidential.


¨      If you need to refer the counselee to someone else or if you need to consult with someone else, state that clearly and concisely.  Straightforwardness lends itself to integrity and accountability
  


¨      Consider all of the components of a situation and its characters:
¨      History
¨      Body - Physical
¨      Soul - Spiritual
¨      Heart - Emotional
¨      Psyche - Psychological
¨      Will - Ego
¨      Mind - Mental
¨      Look for significant and defining patterns.


¨      Take time to sufficiently determine “the problem,” on all of its various levels, before proceeding to propose “the solution.”
¨      Because “the problem” is multi-layered, chances are “the solution” is also.


¨      In defining the problem, remember to utilize the 5 Ws and H:
¨      Who
¨      What
¨      When
¨      Where
¨      Why
¨      How.


¨      Do not be afraid to acknowledge that you do not know something.  If you make fudge, it will eventually melt.  Humility will gain a person’s confidence quicker than a “know-it-all” attitude.  In a lot of instances, your presence will communicate the care and comfort of God and the Church. 

¨      Accordingly, silence is sometimes the most appropriate response.

¨      Beware of transference on behalf of the counselee and yourself.  Know yourself well enough to realize whether your buttons have been pushed.  Observe the counselee to know whether you have pushed a button within him.


¨      Don’t mix apples and oranges.  Stay focused on the matter at hand.


¨      Be clear with the counselee and with yourself about the extent of your willingness, ability, availability and resources to provide help.

¨      Utilize the pastoral conversation to assist the counselee and not yourself.  If it helps you, that should occur as a by-product.

Components of the Dialogue


¨     Ability
¨     Accountability
¨     Analysis
¨     Answers
¨     Assistance
¨     Availability
¨     Characters
¨     Compassion
¨     Confidentiality
¨     Description
¨     Details
¨     Discretion
¨     Discernment
¨     Economics
¨     Empathy
¨     Focus
¨     Follow-up
¨     History
¨     Honesty
¨     How
¨     Humility
¨     Ideology
¨     Integrity
¨     Knowledge
¨     Law
¨     Listening
¨     Memory
¨     Observation
¨     Philosophy
¨     Plot
¨     Politics
¨     Presence
¨     Privilege
¨     Problem Solving
¨     Reassurance
¨     Reconciliation
¨     Reductionism
¨     Referral
¨     Religion (Organized & Institutional)
¨     Resolution
¨     Resources
¨     Restitution
¨     Scene
¨     Setting
¨     Silence
¨     Sociology
¨     Summary
¨     Sympathy
¨     Theology
¨     Theory
¨     Time
¨     Transference
¨     What
¨     When
¨     Where
¨     Who
¨     Why
¨     Willingness
¨     Wisdom
¨     Worldview
¨      Writing – (only when necessary)