“As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.” (Proverbs 27:17 – NIV) Today, I launch a new clergy collegial blog. I hope we will encourage and empower each other toward success and excellence in pastoral ministry. As I sit in the Pastor’s Study at Cambria Heights Community Church, I often ponder the possible feedback of clergy colleagues as it relates to preparing sermons, counseling in particularly difficult situation, designing fresh worship, balancing competing priorities of ministry, marriage and family, maintaining self-care, pursuing personal dreams and private interests outside of ministry and family, and finding resources to meet the ever evolving and changing needs of the people whom I serve. After a sustained period of prayer, reflection and meditation, I realize I can invite you to come “In The Pastor’s Study” for an exchange of ideas.

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Pastoral Musings: The Meditations of My Heart - Part I


Pastoral Musings 
The Meditations of My Heart

Self-evaluation is a vital spiritual discipline which necessitates practice as often as prayer and meditation.  Examining my thoughts, motives and expectations is very important particularly when I am in a conflict with someone.  Miscommunication often emerges when someone is unclear about another person’s intentions and expectations.  A very spiritual Christian sister whose walk with the Lord I highly respect often suggests immediate withdrawal in a personal conflict.  One day at work, she listened attentively as a colleague unleashed a verbal barrage of personal instead of principled criticism against their superior, the executive principal.  The disgruntled coordinator of curriculum’s words equate with character assassination.  In response, my Christian sister’s strongly suggested to her colleague that she take time to reflect and determine what is really disturbing her.  Conceivably, the actions of the principal veil an inner turmoil.  Is there any justification for the extreme emotion and personal nature of her “criticism?”  Have misguided questions and unprincipled gossip contributed to her dissatisfaction?  What is the real issue that requires her mental and emotional energy and practical actions?  Do the policies and procedures of this anal retentive and extremely exacting principal coerce the curriculum coordinator to face latent fears and incapacities? 

The latter administrator had become accustomed to a lack of accountability as the previous principal operated professionally as a combination between Lieutenant Colombo and Mr. Magoo, the quintessence of an efficient affable oaf.  Yet, practicing the vital spiritual discipline of self-evaluation enables a person to shift through the morass of emotions and issues to define what is meaningful.  In many instances, you discover someone who irritates you has simply rekindled an unresolved conflict or character defect.  Instead of forging ahead with unrelenting and unprincipled criticisms of other people, it is best to accept the unmanageability in our lives and cultivate the willingness to change and grow.  Eventually, the curriculum coordinator was terminated as her peers discovered many incomplete tasks she had hidden for more than a year.  Her failure to complete those assignments jeopardized the school’s continuance and created potential legal liabilities.  Rather than disparaging her superior who simply wanted her to do her job, the curriculum coordinator could have learned a lot from the executive principal has she been willing to examine herself.

My foregoing Christian sister also had an opportunity to speak with another colleague who exhibits a stench of superiority towards practically anyone he encounters but specifically those persons with whom he works.  As the only male in the senior administration with a law degree and certified public accountant credentials, he deems the intellect, talents and abilities of the women with whom he works to be decidedly inferior to his.  He rarely foregoes a chance to condescend or critique their contributions and ideas.  Usually, his criticism equals “Had you simply asked me before you formed that thought, spoken that idea or pursued that path, I would have given you the correct answer, concept or action.”  This gentleman is particularly demeaning towards the woman who works most closely with him.  He treats her as if she were an indentured servant rather than a subordinate.  One day, he shared with my Christian sister that he does not understand his inability to achieve greater professional and financial success and attain requisite promotions to achieve those goals.  Given his education, lengthy work experience and the skills he possesses, he really cannot comprehend the zigzagging he has done in the work force.  Persons with less to offer have obtained more than he has.  As he seems incapable of considering his arrogant attitude and behavior toward people, he remains stilted in his career.  His resume resembles a quilt with patches of middle management jobs instead of a mosaic depicting the progressively refined contributions of a committed professional. 

In reply to his question, my Christian sister not surprisingly encouraged him to examine himself.  She stated a self-evident fact; he is the least common denominator in all of his work experiences.  Perhaps, there is something in his character and behavior that impedes his professional progress. Can he realistically expect people to advance him professionally and financially when he demonstrates total disregard towards their personhood and in turn the humanity of the people whom they love.  Does he think his indifference would not have any consequences?  Carl Gustav Jung, the founder of analytical and depth psychology, posits that a person’s refusal to evaluate his “shadow” explains a pattern of self-sabotaging behavior.  “A man who is possessed by his own shadow is always standing in his own light and falling into his own traps.  Wherever possible, he prefers to make an unfavorable impression on others.  In the long run, luck is always against him, because he is living below his own level and at best only attains what does not suit him.  And if there is no doorstep for him to stumble over, he manufactures one for himself and then fondly believes he has done something useful.”  Self-evaluation coupled with genuine willingness to change and grow is the surest remedy for such intractable character defect. 

As a Pastor who feels stifled in ministry, I must apply the foregoing counsel.  In addition to weekly spiritual direction and counseling, I cultivate the “secret disciplines of spirituality” to prevent my character defects and personal incapacities from inhibiting the progress of my ministry.   An anonymous author posits interpersonal conflicts are actually intrapersonal; “whenever we are at odds with someone else it usually means we fail to accept an internal deficiency which requires immediate action.”  As I deal with congregants with whom I experience any conflicts, I remember to consider primarily that I may be contributing negatively to any disagreement.  Sometimes, people simply “push your buttons” thereby causing anger and other unproductive emotions.  As the church is a family, relationships within the congregation often mirror the origins of our childhood family systems.  Oftentimes, many unresolved skirmishes rise from the low-burning ashes of memory.  I suggest the faithful practice of spiritual disciplines is a formidable method of healing past pain that inadvertently affects present situations.  Specifically, journaling using John Bradshaw’s method of writing healing and protective letters to my inner child remains an effective means of healing.  Collegially, I suggest you consider this strategy as a way of overcoming the adverse possibilities of your shadow.

Prior to marriage, I had a chance yet significant conversation with a Deacon in the church where I served as Assistant Pastor.  At a coffee hour in the parlor following an average Sunday morning worship service, he and I began to discuss marriage.  He gave me some of the most sagacious marital advice I have ever received.  The Deacon shared with me that his wife only makes breakfast for him on the weekend.  During the week, she leaves him to fend for himself as she works a full-time job just as he does.  He developed the habit of eating cold cereal and other items that are easy to prepare and quick to consume.  On Saturdays and Sundays, his wife enhances his breakfast with grits, eggs, bacon, homemade biscuits, freshly brewed coffee and other hot items.  He told me that the moral of the story is their willingness to respect each other by establishing a way of relating and meeting each other’s need specifically for the two of them.  Whereas other people may observe their practices and criticize them, this Deacon and his wife would summarily ignore their feedback.  As husband and wife, they resolve to accept and respect each other without the consent and approval of other people.  Knowing that my marriage was imminent, this Deacon strongly recommended that my future wife and I similarly find “what works for the two of you.  If it works for the two of you, you have what you need.  No one else needs to say anything.”

No comments:

Post a Comment